Speaking for the Disenfranchised

I hope that I am old enough, and that society has become tolerant enough, that it will not adversely affect my father and my mother for me to publicly confess that I was born illegitimate.  As a 1952 unplanned pregnancy to an unwed mother, before Roe v. Wade, I would like to speak for the unplanned children of today, please, if I may.

To quote my grandmother (she told me this is what she told my mother):

"You made one mistake.  Now don't make another one."

I realize that abortion is now legal.  Before it was legal, it was available, and it was dangerous to the mother.  It has always been dangerous to the child.  Legalized abortion has not changed that fact.  Abortion is dangerous to the child.  Her life is snatched before a breath is drawn.  Her voice will never be heard.  She cannot do any evil.  She cannot do any good.

My new president, for whom I voted, and in whose vision I see hope, has made two bold acts during his first days in office, to reverse the decisions of our former president.

He has ordered the closing of Guantanamo within a year, and ordered the trials be stopped for 90 days so he can review the situation.

I wish he would have attached a 90 day window to his decision to lift the ban on embryonic stem cell research.  Polarizing voices of the pro-life movement have never, to my knowledge, bothered to table their passion long enough to persuade as though they expected the so-called pro-abortion camp to be open to reason.

I believe, and am convinced, that the "liberal" people I know personally are open to reason.  Have some respect, my conservative friends, and talk without acting all injured self-righteous.  Get your pious pride out of the way of actually making a difference.  There is fresh air blowing.  Add your breath to it.  If you'd get the chip off your shoulder, you might be surprised to discover real human beings who are willing to listen to your reasons for believing embryonic stem cell research is a bad choice.

The same ethics that demand legal advocacy for our presumed enemies, demand a voice for the unborn. 

I'd just like to quote from David McCullough's 2001 biography of John Adams, and then open the floor for discussion.

" 'Do you expect he should behave like a stoic philosopher, lost in apathy?' Adams asked.  Self-defense was the primary canon of the law of nature.  Better that many guilty persons escape unpunished than one innocent person should be punished.  'The reason is, because it's of more importance to community, that innocence should be protected, than it is, that guilt should be punished.'

" 'Facts are stubborn things,' he told the jury, 'and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictums of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.'"